Instead, the phrase 'it is useless' better use 'if you are playing in Europe, if you attacking style, and if it is the middle stage of the game - it is useless. It is better to avoid radical formulations. ' I think the author should not restrict the readers of his style of the game, because there are also other styles. Many of the author's allegations are an ultimatum: 'It is useless' 'never do not do it,' 'the army should be. I will not say which school is better, I want to say that there is an alternative. If you carefully consider the military customs of the Slavs or ancient Chinese doctrine, we can see a completely different priorities and ways of organizing military operations. But it works well only in the European theater of operations and under certain conditions, which are typical of Europe. Of course the experience is good, European military 'school' (eg German) is based on extensive experience and has many strengths. His style of play has a clear taste of old Europe (Perhaps it is too much time spent in the s1914). Reading this I have often thought that the author a German.

How to trade in call of war 1942